Proposal for the Molecular and Cellular Life Sciences Graduate Program
at the
Summary: To strengthen the molecular life sciences and
to make this university more attractive to prospective graduate students, we
advocate the creation of an integrated Molecular and Cellular Life Sciences
program (MCLS) at the
Justification or
Creating the MCLS Program:
Precedents for cross-departmental graduate programs in the molecular
life sciences are numerous. Regional examples include the Molecular, Cellular,
and Developmental Biology program at UC Boulder, and the Cell and Molecular
Biology graduate program at
General Plan: The
MCLS program is modeled after those at other
universities. The graduate program would include appropriate faculty from all
life science departments. The specific process by which faculty would be given
the opportunity to join this program will need to be determined. As a general
guideline, we would unify faculty that seek qualified students who have had
substantial backgrounds in molecular biology, biochemistry, biophysics,
microbiology, cell biology, and genetics and who wish to apply these disciplines
to their graduate work. As a rough estimate, we would expect the MCLS program
to contain approximately twice the number of faculty currently participating in
the MOLB graduate program, resulting in a total of 25 to 30 members.
Historically,
Molecular Biology has used its GA slots to support 5-6 graduate students in
their first year. Following the first year, students are expected to receive
support from extramural grants provided by the lab they join. From the
inception of the MCLS program, MOLB would put all of its current graduate
student slots into the recruitment of new MCLS students. In addition, we ask
that the university match our input to provide six additional slots at current
NIH standards of 18K/ 12 months. In this way, other departments need not invest
resources in students they may not immediately obtain, while MOLB would avoid
seeing a significant reduction in graduate students entering departmental labs.
We ask that these extra slots be funded for a trial period of three years, at which
point the success of the MCLS program would be evaluated.
While the intent of the plan is to incur as little cost as possible for the university and the graduate school, it should be emphasized that good graduate students make money for the institution. The ability to publish and acquire or retain grants in the sciences requires the presence of a capable and motivated graduate student body. An improvement in the overall quality of graduate students will translate directly into greater productivity for the research faculty and increased granting activity. A failure to improve the graduate life science programs at this university will, in the long term, prove to be more costly than the implementation of new programs that are integrated with existing infrastructure and costs.
Some Suggested Program Guidelines: The specific guidelines for graduate studies in the MCLS program would be developed by all participating faculty. We envision that this would include features such as four 8-week research rotations in participating labs that would include at least two departments, prelim exams late in the second year of graduate school, and a requirement to take “core” courses in areas such as development and molecular cell biology, membrane molecular biology, replication, transcription and translation, and protein structure and function. In addition, first-year students will be required to give verbal summaries of each rotation and will be formally evaluated by the program faculty at the end of their second rotation to ensure that standards are being upheld. Students in their second and subsequent years will give an annual seminar report to the MCLS program faculty and students. We note that faculty without grants or other means of support would be unable to serve as thesis advisors for MCLS students.
Many aspects of the program can be modified as it evolves to reflect the composition of the faculty. Additional course offerings, exams, standards, recruiting, etc. will be developed as a committee of the whole. We do however believe that it will be critical to maintain an identity that is grounded in the fundamentals of molecular biology and biochemistry. As a litmus test, all graduate students in the program should, based on their backgrounds and the education they receive, be capable of contributing to the research of any lab within the program. We recognize that a number of excellent life sciences researchers exist at this university who do not routinely utilize molecular biology as a part of their research. The program, as envisioned, discussed, and supported by the faculty of Molecular Biology at a recent retreat, will also serve these faculty by providing a reservoir of expertise and collegial cooperation if they have need of molecular and cellular technologies. Moreover, the MCLS program could serve as a model for environmental and population biologists who may wish to form an umbrella graduate program of their own.
MCLS Interested
Faculty
Large majority
Tod Hanson
Steve Ford
Bill Murdoch
Rich McCormick
Steve Herbert
Anne Sylester
Bill Wilson
Dick Mayer
Barbara S. Drolet
Others…
Kurt Dolence
Paul Thomas
Jun Ren
Several additional new recruits…
Scott Boitano
Zhaojie Zhang
Alberto van Olphen