This site will look much better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device.

Skip Navigation skip menu and banner
University of Wyoming

 

Sampling Design: Upstream and downstream monitoring


This approach refers to sampling above and below a BMP or set of BMPs.

Assumptions:
  • Any changes seen/measured are due to the implementation.
Advantages:
  • This approach directly measures the change in the stream between two points.
  • Typically it covers a relatively short reach of river so it may be easy to collect samples.
  • If there are no changes in flow between the upstream and downstream sites, then concentration can be compared instead of load. This means that flow measurement, which is sometimes difficult to obtain, would not be absolutely necessary; however, if not difficult to obtain, flow should be taken whenever possible. It is important to note that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other agencies typically want to know how much of a pollutant has been removed, which is what a load measurement reveals.
Disadvantages:
  • This approach only works when water is actively moving through the BMP and into the water body. For example, an upstream and downstream plan will not pick up the improvement from a feeding operation during dry, baseflow conditions.
  • In some cases, such as ephemeral stream systems, the best times to collect samples are when it is raining or when snowmelt is running off the land. Otherwise, the changes might be very subtle if seen at all.
When to use this approach:
  • This approach works particularly well for an in-stream implementation, such as a sedimentation trap. This will also work for implementations that affect the stream’s edge, such as willow plantings, but probably only when flows are enough to inundate the planting area.
  • Timing is critical for this type of monitoring. If the BMP is capturing runoff from an off-stream site, sampling during runoff events is necessary to identify the change.