Sidebar Site Navigation
Best Practices - Exams
Examinations are a fundamental form of assessment, but pose particular challenges in distance education. Outreach Credit Programs is committed to assisting faculty to ensure the greatest possible academic integrity in assessing students' achievement in courses delivered at a distance. A high standard of quality and integrity can be achieved through the exam design, a variety in types of assessment exercises, the protection of the exam from redistribution, and ultimately, the requirement of proctored exams where necessary.
UW Outreach School continues to explore technological, pedagogical, and policy strategies toward the goal of enhancing the security and integrity of student assessments.
Examination Support Services
Best Practices in Online Exams
Academic integrity in online exams can be enhanced by wise exam design and controlled management of the examination experience.
- Expect honesty. Through the syllabus, and elsewhere, communicate policies and obligations of academic honesty, and the consequences of dishonesty. Include reference to university regulation(s), and Student Code of Conduct.
- Define dishonesty. Be clear in what is permitted and prohibited when taking an online exam, and the consequences of violations.
- Compose exams as open-book, open-notes. A prohibition on books and notes during an exam is easy to make, impossible to enforce. The temptation is too great for some students, who will have an unfair advantage over the scrupulously honest.
- Include questions beyond factual recall, e.g. problem solving, interpretation, application, or conclusions.
- Create question pools from larger test banks, to create randomized presentations of questions for each student.
- Limit time, of the exam access period (days that students can access the exam), and of time in exam (permitted time to complete the exam).
- Schedule the gradebook release date - the date on which students can review the graded exam - after the end date of the exam access period.
- Provide multiple formative and summative exams, tests, and quizzes throughout the term.
- Provide a diversity of assessments: exams, papers, projects, presentations, journals, etc.
- Revise tests periodically. Ugh, what an effort, but the revisions only need to be enough to undermine sharing copies or memories of an exam.
|Collaborative exam taking||Limit time; randomize questions; review times students take exam; review exam statistics for common incorrect answers; written, application, or problem solving questions; proctoring|
|Prohibited materials (books, notes)||Limit time; questions requiring conclusions, interpretation, problem solving, etc.; proctoring|
|Downloading or capturing exam for redistribution||ExamGuard; question pools; withhold correct answers from graded exam|
|Unauthorized test takers||Proctoring; course design incorporating multiple assessments|
Adkins, J., Kenkel, C, & Lo Lim, C. (2005). Deterrents to online academic dishonesty. The Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 1(1), 17-22. Retrieved May 2, 2011 from http://jwpress.com/JLHE/Issues/v1i1/Deterrents%20to%20Online%20Academic%20Dishonesty.pdf
Brightwell, R., Daniel, J.H., & Stewart, A. (2004). Evaluation: Is an open book examination easier? Bioscience Education e-Journal, 3(3), 2004.
Christe, B. (2003). Designing online courses to discourage dishonesty. Educause Quarterly, 4,54-58.
Crehan, K. (1993). Use of an inclusive option and the optimal number of options for multiple-choice items. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(1), 241-247.
Frary,R. (1991). The none-of-the-above option: An empirical study. Applied Measurement in Education 4(2), 115-124.
Fuhrman, M. (1996). Developing good multiple-choice tests and test questions. Journal of Geoscience Education 44(4), 379-384.
Hricko, M., & Howell, S. (2006). Online assessment and measurement: Foundations and challenges. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
Khare, A., & Lam, H. (2008). Assessing student achievement and progress with online examinations: Some pedagogical and technical issues. International Journal on E-Learning 7(3). 383-402.
Krovitz, G.E. (2007). Ways to prevent cheating on online exams. Educator’s Voice, 8(6). Retrieved May 2, 2011, from http://www.ecollege.com/Newsletter/EducatorsVoice/EducatorsVoice-Vol8Iss6.learn
Olt, M. (2002). Ethics and distance education: Strategies for minimizing academic dishonesty in online assessment. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(3). Retrieved December 14, 2007 from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall53/olt53.html
Rocco, S. (2007). Online assessment and evaluation. New Directions in Adult and Continuing Education, 113, 75-86.
Rohrer, E. (2006). Creating quality multiple choice questions. Educator’s Voice, 7(5). Retrieved January 30, 2008, from http://www.ecollege.com/Newsletter/EducatorsVoice/EducatorsVoice-Vol7Iss5.learn
Simpson, D., Cohen, E. (1985, March). Problem solving questions for multiple choice tests: A method for analyzing the cognitive demands of items. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED259033.pdf.
Talmir, P. (1991). Multiple choice items: How to gain the most out of them. Biochemical Education, 19(4), 188-191.
Waite, J. (2007). Weekly quizzing really works! Online software makes it easy. Tech Directions, 66(7), 16-21.
Williams, J.B., Wong, A. (2009). The efficacy of final examinations: A comparative study of closed-book, invigilated exams and open-book, open-web exams. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 227-236.