Table 1.  Agronomic performance of spring barley genotypes grown at Powell, WY during 2005.

 

Variety

Row

Type

Grade

Plant

height

Heading

date

 

Lodge

Grain

yield

Test

weight

Plumpness

6/64

5.5/64

      inches Days from Jan. 1

1-9

bu/acre

lb/bu

% above screen

Malt Use

Moravian 69

2

M

29.3

176

1.3

154.9

49.7

95.0

98.3

98Ab11993

2

M

30.3

176

2.0

147.7

50.38

97.1

99.0

01NZ392

6

F/M

37.6

177

1.7

145.2

47.48

96.7

99.1

2B99-2763-10

2

M

30.5

176

1.7

140.7

49.44

96.4

98.7

WA 8569-99

2

F/M

32.4

176

3.3

140.1

50.97

92.8

98.0

2B99-2657

2

M

31.9

177

2.7

139.3

47.31

92.5

97.6

Merit

2

M

36.2

177

1.7

137.8

48.5

92.9

97.8

Conrad

2

M

33.2

177

2.7

137.8

51.4

97.1

99.1

99NZ102

6

F/M

34.8

175

1.7

136.9

47.19

93.3

98.5

2B99-2316

2

M

31.4

177

2.0

134.4

49.57

91.5

97.6

ND21863

2

M

36.0

176

1.0

129.9

49.68

98.8

99.4

WA 10701-99 

2

F/M

33.5

176

3.0

128.9

50.62

95.4

98.5

2B99-2039

2

M

34.5

176

2.0

128.3

51.15

98.3

99.4

99Ab11073

2

M

35.5

172

1.7

127.8

47.76

94.6

98.3

Stander

6

M

36.0

172

2.3

126.2

49.06

97.9

98.6

B1202

2

M

33.6

177

3.0

124.3

49.4

97.2

99.2

Harrington

2

M

34.5

176

2.3

124.2

50.16

97.9

99.3

98Ab12905

6

M

33.9

172

1.0

121.1

48.3

96.9

99.1

PB1-97-2R-7010

2

F/M

34.8

177

1.0

119.0

50.51

98.7

99.3

MT000047

2

F/M

33.7

175

2.0

118.5

52.21

97.1

98.8

Sellar (ND16301)

6

M

36.0

172

3.3

116.0

48.15

96.8

98.9

2B99-2771-1

2

M

30.7

177

1.3

114.4

50.20

97.7

99.3

ND19854

2

M

35.1

172

1.7

113.3

51.17

98.3

99.2

01NZ706

6

F/M

35.6

176

1.3

113.2

47.78

94.7

98.8

MT000125

2

F/M

32.7

176

2.0

111.6

50.78

97.7

99.0

Morex

6

M

40.5

172

5.3

110.2

48.31

91.7

98.1

MT000138

2

F/M

31.7

176

1.3

96.6

51.96

98.2

99.4

 

Feed Use

Xena

2

F

34.9

175

1.7

151.6

51.3

97.4

99.0

Baronesse

2

F

33.5

176

2.7

149.0

51.20

94.7

98.6

WA 7330-00

2

F

31.9

175

2.0

142.7

50.55

93.0

98.0

Steptoe

6

F

36.1

172

2.3

141.1

47.01

95.8

98.5

Boulder

2

F

34.5

176

1.7

139.8

51.9

97.7

99.1

YU501-385

2

F

34.8

175

1.3

139.3

51.90

97.7

99.2

YU501-163

2

F

33.4

176

1.0

136.5

51.39

98.0

99.2

01ST1758

2

F,RWA

31.5

175

1.3

134.8

51.56

96.5

98.8

UT99B1670-3458

6

F

34.5

172

1.3

133.5

46.63

97.2

98.8

UT99B1669-3243

6

F

34.5

172

1.7

131.4

46.92

97.0

98.8

WA 15279-00

2

F

31.7

176

1.3

127.4

50.24

95.0

98.7

01ST1587

2

F,RWA

32.8

175

1.7

127.0

50.72

97.6

99.0

WA 10429-00

2

F

31.9

176

1.0

126.0

49.73

97.6

99.4

YU 597-432

2

F

31.9

175

1.0

124.2

50.54

96.0

98.8

Haxby

2

F

34.8

177

1.7

123.1

52.2

97.3

99.1

Gallatin

2

F

33.5

175

1.7

122.7

51.4

97.5

99.8

96RWA1222

6

F,RWA

36.9

176

5.7

115.2

46.88

88.5

97.1

UT97B1480-1534

6

F

33.6

172

1.7

103.3

49.9

93.9

98.7

Mean

 

 

33.8

 

1.98

129

49.8

96.0

98.8

LSD 0.05

 

 

3.6

 

1.1

23.0

1.0

2.4

0.8

CV%

 

 

6.5

 

34.1

11.0

1.2

1.5

0.5

NS=non significant

Lodge= 1 upright, 9 flat.

M=Malting, F=Feed, RWA=Russian Wheat Aphid Resistant

 


Table 2.  Agronomic performance of spring barley genotypes grown at Sheridan, WY during 2005.

 

 

Variety

Row

Type

Grade

Plant

height

Heading

date

 

 

Grain

yield

Test

weight

Plumpness

 

6/64

5.5/64

 

 

 

 

inches

 

Days from Jan. 1  

 

 bu/acre

 lb/bu

 % above screen

 

 

Malt Use

 

98AB11993

2

M

29.3

172

 

92

44.5

87.0

96.4

 

B1202

2

M

25.0

172

 

79

41.0

70.2

92.6

 

Conrad

2

M

28.0

172

 

64

44.0

80.5

94.8

 

Harrington

2

M

30.3

172

 

59

41.6

80.4

94.1

 

98Ab12905

6

M

33.7

170

 

57

43.2

77.7

94.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Feed Use

 

Boulder

2

F

29.3

172

 

87

47.9

86.2

96.6

 

Steptoe

6

F

31.0

170

 

81

41.8

84.6

95.6

 

Baronesse

2

F

27.7

172

 

74

44.8

66.8

91.8

 

Xena

2

F

26.3

172

 

63

46.2

78.3

95.3

 

UT97B1480-1534

6

F

29.3

171

 

61

44.6

75.0

92.1

 

Haxby

2

F

25.3

172

 

60

49.1

82.0

94.3

 

Gallatin

2

F

28.7

172

 

57

45.7

72.4

92.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mean

 

 

28.7

172

 

70

44.5

78.4

94.3

 

LSD 0.05

 

 

4.7

1

 

NS

1.4

8.7

2.6

 

CV%

 

 

9.6

0.4

 

23.1

1.9

6.6

1.6

 

NS=non significant

M=Malting, F=Feed

 


Table 3.  Agronomic performance of spring barley genotypes grown at Lingle, WY (SAREC) during 2005.

 

 

Variety

Row

Type

Grade

Plant

height

Heading

date

 

 

Grain

yield

Test

weight

Plumpness

 

 

6/64

5.5/64

 

 

 

 

inches

Days from Jan. 1 

 

bu/acre

lb/bu

% above screen

 

Malt Use

 

98AB11993

2

M

34

175

 

33

 

 

 

 

B1202

2

M

34.7

174

 

39

 

 

 

 

Conrad

2

M

32.3

175

 

40

 

 

 

 

Harrington

2

M

34.7

172

 

42

 

 

 

 

98Ab12905

6

M

31.6

170

 

36

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Feed Use

 

Boulder

2

F

34.7

174

 

57

 

 

 

 

Steptoe

6

F

37

169

 

57

 

 

 

 

Baronesse

2

F

34.7

171

 

51

 

 

 

 

Xena

2

F

35

174

 

39

 

 

 

 

UT97B1480-1534

6

F

29.7

168

 

46

 

 

 

 

Haxby

2

F

34.7

173

 

47

 

 

 

 

Gallatin

2

F

34

173

 

63

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mean

 

 

33.9

172

 

46

 

 

 

 

LSD 0.05

 

 

3.4

6.7

 

NS

 

 

 

 

CV%

 

 

5.9

2.3

 

38.4

 

 

 

 

NS=non significant

M=Malting, F=Feed