Skip to Main Navigation. Each navigation link will open a list of sub navigation links.

Skip to Main Content

Apply to the University of Wyoming apply now

Global Resource Navigation

Visit Campus
Download UW Viewbook
Give to UW

UW Religion Today: Liberty, Equality and the Meaning of Religious Freedom

September 6, 2017
religious studies logo

By Paul V.M. Flesher

The Declaration of Independence placed the Enlightenment ideal of “liberty” at the heart of the American soul. It cites liberty among the reasons for creating our new country. “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.”

The basic meaning of liberty is the ability to do what one wants. Of course, even schoolchildren know that unbridled liberty is impossible. If one person decides he or she wants to kill another -- an extreme example -- the second person’s liberty is violated, to say nothing of his or her life.

Liberty as a political or governing policy thus consists of balancing of each individual’s ability to behave as he or she wishes against others’ freedom to do the same. The goal is to achieve an equality of liberty for everyone, with everyone attaining as much freedom as possible.

Another widely used definition of liberty is one of freedom from oppression; as the Merriam-Webster dictionary puts it, “freedom from arbitrary or despotic control.” This notion of liberty inspired the Puritans to leave England and come to the New World. They wanted the freedom to believe and worship as they were convinced that God wanted them to.

If America’s notion of liberty began with this bid for religious liberty, the result was initially disappointing. True, in 1620, the Puritans established a colony at Plymouth where they followed their faith freely.

But, the Puritan notion of religious freedom was limited to themselves and their own beliefs and practices. It did not extend to anyone who believed different from them. In that, they were no different from the Church of England, which had developed its discriminatory policies under King James (d. 1625).

When Roger Williams and, then, Anne Hutchinson developed theological positions that differed from those of the Puritans, they were banished. Williams fled to Rhode Island where, in 1636, he founded Providence as the first community run on the basis of religious freedom. Hutchinson and her followers later settled there.

Although we often call Williams the founder of religious liberty, what he really created was religious equality. The practical effect of bringing together several groups with different religious beliefs in Rhode Island set up an ironic conundrum: Religious freedom had to be restricted to achieve the highest level of religious liberty.

Each group in Rhode Island was free under the second definition of liberty -- that of freedom from oppression and control. But, they were not free under the first one -- that of the unlimited ability to do as they wished. Where one group’s free expression of belief and practice impinged upon another’s, they had to work out a compromise to prevent that. These compromises usually limited both sides’ freedom although, ideally, with as little limitation as possible.

America’s great reputation for religious freedom is therefore the reputation for religious equality. Every religion and every version of a religion are free to worship and believe as each one chooses, as long as it does not impinge upon the rights of others. The clarion call we still sound for religious liberty is a call for equal rights of all religions.

That is what makes America the standard bearer for religious freedom. Religious refugees from around the world flock to our country because they know they can worship without persecution here.

What is opposite of equal rights for all religions? Despotism.

If a country allows one religion to worship and act in accordance with its beliefs at the expense of other religions, then that country no longer has freedom of religion but the religious equivalent of political dictatorship.

This is the situation for many countries around the world. They have a political system that favors one religion or even one version of a religion. That preference permits the members of the favored religion rights and privileges others do not have.

This is true whether the religion is Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, Judaism and even Christianity. The difference in rights between the religion in favor and those out of favor range from mild to extreme, from England’s support of Anglicanism with public taxes, to Israel’s allowing Judaism’s Orthodox wing of Judaism to control marriage law, to frequent persecution of Christians for blasphemy in Islamic countries.

Only equal rights for all religions and all religious people, as well as nonreligious beliefs and people, ensures the most religious freedom possible. Any other position penalizes those who do not follow the privileged faith.

Flesher is a professor in UW’s Department of Religious Studies. Past columns and more information about the program can be found on the web at www.uwyo.edu/RelStds. To comment on this column, visit http://religion-today.blogspot.com.


Share This Page:

Contact Us

Institutional Communications

Bureau of Mines Building, Room 137

Laramie

Laramie, WY 82071

Phone: (307) 766-2929

Email: cbaldwin@uwyo.edu

Find us on Facebook (Link opens a new window) Find us on Twitter (Link opens a new window)

1000 E. University Ave. Laramie, WY 82071
UW Operators (307) 766-1121 | Contact Us | Download Adobe Reader

Twitter Icon Youtube Icon Instagram Icon Facebook Icon

Accreditation | Emergency Preparedness | Employment at UW | Gainful Employment | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Accessibility information icon