Thorsten Janus

Assistant Professor

University of Wyoming

 

128 Ross Hall    

College of Business

Department of Economics and Finance,

Dept. 3985

Laramie, WY 82071

Email: tjanus@uwyo.edu

Ph.: 1-307-760-3384

Fax: 1-307-766-5090

   

CV

 

Working Papers

When do Lending Sanctions Work?”, April 2008

 

Several reasons suggest that lending sanctions may be a more effective foreign policy tool than trade sanctions. This paper examines, using a basic public finance model, under which circumstances a reduction in an abusive government’s ability to borrow will improve the welfare of citizens and/or decrease that of the government. Though lending sanctions will generally hurt the government, they will fail to help citizens in the baseline model.  However, I also suggest some alternative assumptions under which the sanctions will indeed help citizens and I show that lending sanctions will never hurt the citizens.

      

Sticks and Carrots: Two Incentive Mechanisms Supporting Intra-Group Cooperation” (with Jamus Jerome Lim), revised February 2008

 

In this note we introduce two distinct incentive mechanisms that support dynamic intra-group cooperation in the context of prisoner's dilemma payoffs. The first mechanism involves a reward structure---a carrot---that supports both triadic and tripartite group relations. The second mechanism involves a punishment structure---a stick---that supports tripartite group relations. We also discuss how these mechanisms are relevant in real-world groups such as criminal gangs and military platoons.

 

Holding Nature Hostage” December 2007

Countries controlling scarce resource stocks which benefit the rest of the world, such as tropical forests or rare plants and animals, have incentives to manipulate the willingness to pay of outside countries by depleting their stocks. This incentive is above and beyond any direct flow benefits from the stock and can lead to depletion even when the flow benefit is negative. This view is consistent with lax efforts to prevent environmental degradation in many developing countries. Dispersed rest-of-world consumers are worse (better) off due to dispersion when the flow benefit is positive (negative).

 

 

Inefficient Sovereign Defaults”, November 2007

(submitted, Review of International Economics)

 

Many argue that financial crisis resolution should become more efficient and opponents mainly emphasize the detrimental effects on incentives ex-ante of greater efficiency ex-post. However, renegotiation theory suggests that debtors should be able to “buy their way back to efficiency” ex-post and for this privilege creditors can potentially charge them so much that ex-ante incentives are not distorted. Thus, making crisis resolution efficient should be “reform without losers” (Lau et al., 2000). We show, however, that creditors may not be able to help themselves ex-post without also helping the debtor: even if the debtor defaults it is still a high return country so efficiency warrants that it receives a large capital inflow. This raises its welfare. Thus contracts which cannot be renegotiated and cause a sure efficiency loss in case of default can be efficient ex-ante.              

 

International Public Goods and Sovereign Debt”, Revised December, 2007

  (submitted, Environmental and Resource Economics)

 

An obligation to pay for international public goods, such as a cooler environment, can be equivalent to a rise in national debt because the country is required to spend more than it prefers. The obligation can therefore strain the country’s credit ceiling. We show in this paper that if the planned financial debt plus the obligation to pay for the public good exceeds a critical level there can be either defaults or financial investment distortions. Defaults will raise the costs borne by countries which care for the public good and investment distortions lower the gains to trade in capital. In the financial distortions case the real cost of paying for the public good  could be substantially higher than the direct cost. Since the lending market is competitive debtors bear the loss.

 

 

                                                Mistrusting Strangers as a Social Norm”,  September 2007

 

We explain mistrust of newcomers to a community as a second-best response to incomplete information not about their character but the reasons why they came. This lack of information implies that all newcomers must be treated as if they were known to have been dishonest in social relationships in the past. However, newcomers can eventually earn trust.

 

 

 

                                                Monopoly and the Joneses”, September 2007

                                                (under review, Economics Letters)

This paper considers keeping-up-with-the-Joneses sentiment among consumers in a standard monopoly model. We show that although monopoly and pressure to live up to a reference group both drive up the price level the monopoly may set the price below the planner’s solution. On this background not surprisingly the welfare effects of competition are ambiguous: while competition lowers prices it exacerbates the Joneses externality. The perfect competition outcome is inefficient since only the second effect remains.

 

 

Intervention under generalized moral hazard”, August 2007

 (Revise and Resubmit, Ethnopolitics)

 

Recent literature suggests that well-intentioned third party intervention in military conflict can lead to moral hazard by acting as a subsidy to rebellion. In this paper we suggest (i) qualification and generalization of this moral hazard argument, and (ii) a classification scheme of potential conflicts in the world which can be used to derive the optimal policy for intervention on a case-by-case basis. The optimal policy may be to intervene at random since certainty in some cases will necessarily encourage either the party who benefits from intervention or the opponent to attack. The model also suggests that post-conflict aid and a siding-with-the-winner approach may promote the incidence of conflicts even if it lowers the loss from unavoidable conflicts

 

 

Democracy, Capital Flows, and Odious Debt”, August 2007

 (under review, Journal of International Trade and Economic

                                                 Development)

 

This paper presents a model relating democracy, public and private international capital flows, and odious debt. Democracy commits the ruler to pass borrowed funds on to the private sector which builds the country’s international collateral, and the consequent rise in the credit ceiling is a Pareto-improvement up to a point because the ruler can appropriate a smaller share of rising loan. However, the ruler may still impose odious debt in the sense that, given democracy, the private sector prefers the country to borrow less. Under conditions a fall in the world interest rate or a rise in productivity growth increases the optimal level of democracy, borrowing, investment, and welfare. The model fits the global trends toward democracy, falling interest rates, and larger absolute and relative borrowing by the private sector in non-developed countries since the debt crises of the early 1980s. We offer evidence from a global panel. 

 

 

Why do Majorities Support Extremists?”, July 2007

 

We  identify  four cases of collectively rational support by “moderate” agents for “extremist” politicians. First, the posterior assessment of the unobservable ability of a moderate after a low output realization may be worse than for an extremist. Second, if economic conditions bring consumption close to a critical lower bound, and the ability distribution for extremists has a relatively high variance, then agents can gain from “gambling for resurrection”. Third, interactions across societies or social groups may favor delegation to an extremist leader. Fourth, some extremists may be less likely to reverse ax-ante efficient reforms if they hurt a majority ex-post, or more likely to reverse reforms if key ex-ante constituents are hurt and politically weakened ex-post. By the last result, extremists can help to overcome ex-ante political constraints to reform.

 

 

                                                Aid and the Soft Budget Constraint”, June 2007

 (Forthcoming, Review of Development Economics)

 

This paper applies the theory of the soft budget constraint to explain some stylized facts regarding the outcomes and practice of international aid, including ineffectiveness, white elephants, and volatility. The soft budget constraint can also make aid counterproductive. Nonetheless, actual aid institutions may be constrained optimal responses to the SBC problem and commonly suggested reforms such as improved donor coordination, focus on fewer countries and projects, and less volatility may lower the effectiveness of aid. The SBC also predicts conservative project selection and is consistent with the recent focus on “ownership”.

 

 

Trust and Culture”, April 2007/corrected proof September 2007

 (under review, International Game Theory Review)

 

This paper shows that cultural diversity can promote trust by limiting the size of a population of interacting agents. In a large homogenous population the quality of information regarding the past behavior of other parties is low and consequently there is no trust. However, in a diverse population individuals can choose only to interact with and trust people from their own cultural group. The absence of trust across cultural boundaries discourages cross-cultural encounters, raises the quality of information on partners and justifies trust within the group. However, while diversity enables trust the population scale of each group is inefficiently small. Also, cultural boundaries must be enforced so that agents can stay recognizably different. Such cultural boundary enforcement is consistent with norms against inter-cultural marriage and inter-group hostilities.

 

 

Public Investment with Insecure Public Property Rights”,  December 2006

 

 

A group of agents in government receives endowment income and can supply productive capital to another group every period over the infinite horizon. The other group can employ its labor to either produce or expropriate and can also transfer any produced output to the ruling group. The paper characterizes the set of self-enforcing efficient dynamic contracts when the endowment and output streams are stochastic. The findings include (i) even narrowly controlled, self-interested governments who cannot impose taxes on the rest of society may want to invest in expanding its productive capacity, (ii) investment may be inefficiently small at first but rises toward the efficient level if the contract is sustained, (iii) natural resource or foreign aid income when the current period marginal cost of rent seeking is low will not necessarily lead to equilibrium rent-seeking, (iv) the ruling group may be forced to accept low or negative returns on public investments, and (v) weak self-interested governments may lead to higher growth than strong self-interested governments.

 

 

  Courses Taught

 

Econ 4720: International Trade

 

Econ 5720: Advanced International Trade

 

Econ 1010: Principles of Macroeconomics

 

MBAM/MBAX 5330: Advanced Managerial Economics/Global Business Environment

 

Econ 4700: Economic Development

 

Econ 5300: Game Theory